The following information provides an analysis of the accuracy of Zestimates for properties across different states in the U.S. It compares the median error rates for off-market and on-market properties, giving insights into the reliability of these estimates
Additional Insights
Further analysis can include insights at the metropolitan area and county level, offering a more granular view of Zestimate accuracy and coverage. Use the below sections for deeper analysis.
Over time, Zillow’s Zestimate has become a popular tool for homeowners and buyers alike, but how reliable is it? As you navigate the sometimes murky waters of real estate valuation, understanding how accurate is Zestimate can significantly impact your decisions. In this post, we’ll explore the factors that influence this online estimate, compare it with other valuation methods, and provide you with tips on how to use it effectively in your property journey.
While navigating the real estate market, understanding the Zestimate is imperative for making informed decisions about your property. This online tool provides an estimated market value for homes based on various data points, assisting you in assessing whether you are making a sound investment or considering selling your home at a fair price.
For you, the Zestimate is an estimated home value generated by Zillow, utilizing proprietary algorithms that analyze various data sources. This figure aims to provide a ballpark valuation of your property, helping you gauge its worth without needing a formal appraisal.
Around the clock, Zestimate calculations take into account numerous factors, such as recent sales in your area, property features, tax assessments, and market trends. By providing a snapshot of your home’s estimated value, it makes your home-buying or selling process more streamlined.
But keep in mind that while the Zestimate offers a useful reference point, it may not always reflect your property’s unique characteristics or local market nuances. Factors like home condition, specific location, and upgrades can significantly impact value but may not be fully considered in the algorithm. For a more accurate assessment, combining the Zestimate with insights from local real estate professionals is recommended.
Any inaccuracies in the Zestimate can stem from various factors, including:
Assume that these elements combine to create fluctuations in Zestimate accuracy.
One key aspect of the Zestimate’s accuracy lies in the data sources and algorithms used by Zillow. The Zestimate is generated using a complex algorithm that considers public property records, recent sales data, and various property characteristics. Accurate and comprehensive data is imperative for the algorithm to produce reliable estimates.
Any shifts in market conditions and trends can directly impact your Zestimate. Factors like buyer demand, interest rates, and economic variables will influence property valuations and, consequently, Zestimates across the board.
Further examining market conditions reveals that local real estate activity can cause significant fluctuations in home values. For instance, a surge in new development or an influx of buyers can elevate property values, while economic downturns can lead to decreased demand and lower prices. Being aware of these trends can help you better understand the context behind your home’s Zestimate.
Despite the convenience of Zestimates, they’re not infallible. When comparing the Zestimate to actual home values, you may notice discrepancies. Zillow’s What is a Zestimate? Zillow’s Zestimate Accuracy provides insight into how these automated valuations stack up against real sales. The following table illustrates some contrasts between the two: Table: Zestimate vs. Actual Values
Zestimate | Actual Sale Price |
---|---|
$300,000 | $280,000 |
$450,000 | $460,000 |
$375,000 | $390,000 |
With real-life case studies, you can clearly see how Zestimates can vary significantly from actual home sales. Here are some examples:
This highlights that while Zestimates can serve as a starting point, they may not always reflect true market conditions.
Examples of Zestimate limitations include lack of property details and local market trends that affect home values. Due to relying on algorithms, Zestimates may not capture unique features, neighborhood changes, or the condition of a home accurately.
Studies indicate that these automated estimates often effectively gauge overall market trends but may miscalculate individual properties. By understanding the limitations of Zestimates, you can better assess their reliability for your real estate decisions.
Unlike other home valuation tools, the Zestimate has garnered a wide range of user experiences. Some users find it to be a helpful starting point in understanding their property value, while others express skepticism regarding its accuracy. For further insights, check out How Accurate Is the Zillow Zestimate?.
Experiences shared by users often highlight the convenience and accessibility of the Zestimate tool. Many appreciate that it provides a quick estimate without needing a formal appraisal, giving them a baseline for potential real estate decisions.
Experiences with the Zestimate are not without challenges. Some users report significant discrepancies between the Zestimate and the actual sale prices of homes in their neighborhoods, leading to confusion and frustration.
Understanding the limitations of the Zestimate is important for your real estate journey. Many factors such as local market conditions, recent renovations, and unique property features may not be accurately considered in the algorithm, resulting in potentially misleading estimates. As a result, it’s wise to supplement the Zestimate with additional research and consult with real estate professionals for a more comprehensive view of your property’s market value.
Now that you know the limitations of the Zestimate, you might wonder about other options for assessing your home’s value. For a more reliable evaluation, consider seeking professional appraisals or exploring additional online valuation tools. Check out That Zestimate is NOT Accurate for further insights on this topic.
Along with online tools, hiring a professional appraiser can provide you with a comprehensive analysis of your property’s worth. These experts assess various factors, including the local real estate market, property condition, and recent sales data, ensuring an accurate and detailed valuation that you can trust.
Valuation methods extend beyond the Zestimate; there are several online tools available that can assist you in determining your home’s worth. Many real estate websites offer their proprietary algorithms, which consider different variables to provide a ballpark figure.
It’s necessary to explore multiple online valuation tools as they often yield different estimates based on the data they analyze. Some popular options include Redfin, Realtor.com, and Trulia. While these tools can offer valuable insights, it’s best to utilize them alongside professional appraisals and local market trends for a more comprehensive understanding of your property’s value.
Many real estate enthusiasts turn to Zestimate as a useful tool, but knowing how to leverage it correctly is key. Use it as a starting point while supplementing it with additional market research, local expert advice, and recent sales data in your area. This combined approach will give you a clearer picture of property values, helping you make informed decisions whether you are buying or selling.
Interpret Zestimate not as an absolute figure but as a baseline estimate. It reflects the estimated market value but can fluctuate significantly based on local nuances, recent property sales, and market trends. Always consider cross-referencing it with comparable property sales and local listings to gauge its reliability.
With the right mindset, you can enhance your buying or selling experience using Zestimate. Here are some tips:
Thou can achieve better results by remaining proactive in your approach.
Another effective strategy involves being aware of market fluctuations as you navigate buying or selling your home. You should consider these actions to stay ahead:
Thou can empower yourself by staying informed.
Following this exploration of the accuracy of the Zestimate, you should understand that while it provides a useful starting point for home values, it is not infallible. Varied local factors and recent sales can significantly influence its precision. To make informed decisions about your real estate investments, you should consider combining Zestimates with professional appraisals and local market insights. Ultimately, utilizing a multi-faceted approach will enhance your understanding of your property’s worth.
State | Median Error | Homes With Zestimates | Within 5% of Sale Price | Within 10% of Sales Price | Within 20% of Sales Price |
Atlanta | 2.02% | 25.2 K | 82.43% | 94.14% | 98.12% |
Austin | 2.34% | 14.2 K | 80.78% | 94.29% | 98.62% |
Baltimore | 2.04% | 7.4 K | 77.03% | 90.51% | 95.38% |
Boston | 2.53% | 10.9 K | 75.22% | 93.24% | 98.97% |
Charlotte | 1.89% | 10.4 K | 82.75% | 94.65% | 98.22% |
Chicago | 2.25% | 38.3 K | 79.49% | 93.53% | 98.29% |
Cincinnati | 2.51% | 6.5 K | 75.40% | 92.75% | 98.22% |
Cleveland | 3.04% | 5.8 K | 69.18% | 89.50% | 97.13% |
Colorado Springs | 1.46% | 3.6 K | 91.09% | 97.92% | 99.51% |
Dallas-Fort Worth | 2.00% | 26.3 K | 81.96% | 94.36% | 98.43% |
Denver | 1.55% | 11.8 K | 88.25% | 97.52% | 99.57% |
Detroit | 2.63% | 12.6 K | 72.75% | 89.89% | 96.59% |
Fort Collins | 1.52% | 1.5 K | 89.36% | 97.38% | 99.03% |
Houston | 2.23% | 30.8 K | 81.07% | 94.35% | 98.40% |
Jacksonville | 2.13% | 8.9 K | 81.95% | 94.01% | 98.46% |
Kansas City | 2.41% | 6.9 K | 75.81% | 91.92% | 97.53% |
Las Vegas | 2.04% | 14.6 K | 85.68% | 96.07% | 98.73% |
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | 2.16% | 28.0 K | 79.23% | 93.95% | 98.87% |
Miami-Fort Lauderdale | 2.48% | 50.5 K | 78.08% | 93.41% | 98.38% |
Minneapolis-St Paul | 1.91% | 11.1 K | 83.99% | 95.98% | 99.16% |
Nashville | 2.07% | 9.8 K | 81.72% | 93.87% | 98.09% |
New York | 2.75% | 55.8 K | 71.99% | 90.74% | 97.87% |
Orlando | 2.10% | 14.9 K | 84.56% | 95.68% | 98.98% |
Philadelphia | 2.71% | 18.3 K | 71.48% | 89.01% | 96.19% |
Phoenix | 1.92% | 24.7 K | 86.96% | 96.61% | 99.16% |
Pittsburgh | 3.00% | 7.2 K | 66.91% | 86.54% | 95.71% |
Portland | 1.82% | 8.5 K | 84.98% | 95.84% | 99.29% |
Raleigh | 1.82% | 4.1 K | 85.11% | 95.87% | 98.80% |
Riverside | 1.85% | 20.2 K | 82.15% | 93.37% | 97.19% |
Sacramento | 2.09% | 9.0 K | 82.67% | 94.74% | 98.64% |
San Antonio | 2.21% | 13.8 K | 79.70% | 92.71% | 97.57% |
San Diego | 2.04% | 8.1 K | 82.18% | 95.05% | 98.68% |
San Francisco | 3.11% | 10.1 K | 67.07% | 87.46% | 97.62% |
Seattle | 2.11% | 9.1 K | 82.53% | 94.85% | 98.97% |
St. Louis | 2.86% | 8.2 K | 69.79% | 89.31% | 97.62% |
Tampa | 2.29% | 22.4 K | 82.84% | 94.90% | 98.60% |
Tucson | 1.81% | 4.3 K | 84.05% | 95.71% | 98.68% |
Washington | 1.66% | 15.2 K | 85.08% | 96.14% | 99.04% |
Alabama | 2.62% | 22.6 K | 72.54% | 88.13% | 95.62% |
Alaska | NA | 3.2K | NA | NA | NA |
Arizona | 1.99% | 36.5 K | 84.92% | 95.59% | 98.73% |
Arkansas | 2.71% | 12.2 K | 70.99% | 88.03% | 95.51% |
California | 2.18% | 106.9 K | 78.88% | 92.97% | 98.09% |
Colorado | 1.63% | 27.0 K | 87.03% | 96.58% | 99.18% |
Connecticut | 2.95% | 10.2 K | 69.21% | 90.59% | 98.12% |
Delaware | 2.59% | 3.1 K | 70.04% | 82.21% | 89.44% |
District of Columbia | 1.94% | 2.8 K | 80.28% | 94.37% | 98.47% |
Florida | 2.39% | 179.1 K | 79.66% | 93.58% | 98.19% |
Georgia | 2.17% | 42.6 K | 79.71% | 92.39% | 97.40% |
Hawaii | 2.09% | 5.2 K | 78.52% | 93.60% | 98.56% |
Idaho | 2.14% | 9.6 K | 82.86% | 94.72% | 99.00% |
Illinois | 2.58% | 47.6 K | 74.42% | 90.67% | 97.22% |
Indiana | 2.56% | 17.0 K | 73.97% | 90.80% | 97.19% |
Iowa | 2.06% | 15.0 K | 80.93% | 93.65% | 97.36% |
Kansas | 2.44% | 11.7 K | 74.87% | 91.41% | 97.30% |
Kentucky | 2.56% | 14.9 K | 74.05% | 90.64% | 97.19% |
Louisiana | 2.42% | 18.2 K | 75.62% | 89.94% | 96.61% |
Maine | 3.72% | 4.2 K | 60.61% | 84.13% | 95.19% |
Maryland | 1.96% | 15.6 K | 78.48% | 91.81% | 96.73% |
Massachusetts | 2.59% | 15.3 K | 74.26% | 92.83% | 98.60% |
Michigan | 2.86% | 29.6 K | 70.49% | 88.99% | 96.73% |
Minnesota | 2.18% | 17.6 K | 79.41% | 94.05% | 98.43% |
Mississippi | 2.75% | 10.2 K | 71.57% | 89.90% | 96.56% |
Missouri | 2.83% | 21.9 K | 70.69% | 88.97% | 97.01% |
Montana | 3.02% | 6.2 K | 68.67% | 89.63% | 95.99% |
Nebraska | 2.01% | 7.4 K | 79.17% | 91.76% | 97.59% |
Nevada | 2.09% | 19.0 K | 84.89% | 95.52% | 98.45% |
New Hampshire | 2.72% | 6.1 K | 72.92% | 91.91% | 97.94% |
New Jersey | 2.81% | 28.8 K | 70.92% | 90.29% | 97.89% |
New Mexico | 1.93% | 7.2 K | 80.61% | 93.18% | 98.08% |
New York | 3.50% | 55.6 K | 62.59% | 84.39% | 96.13% |
North Carolina | 2.13% | 37.2 K | 78.62% | 92.77% | 97.69% |
North Dakota | 2.00% | 3.4 K | 78.97% | 93.15% | 98.04% |
Ohio | 2.92% | 33.7 K | 68.97% | 88.57% | 96.48% |
Oklahoma | 2.61% | 16.0 K | 72.27% | 89.19% | 96.32% |
Oregon | 2.04% | 17.5 K | 81.96% | 94.44% | 98.74% |
Pennsylvania | 2.89% | 37.7 K | 68.90% | 88.50% | 96.48% |
Rhode Island | 2.78% | 3.0 K | 71.60% | 91.27% | 97.71% |
South Carolina | 2.14% | 25.0 K | 80.07% | 93.16% | 97.75% |
South Dakota | 2.15% | 3.6 K | 80.00% | 94.71% | 98.24% |
Tennessee | 2.42% | 28.6 K | 74.91% | 90.32% | 96.76% |
Texas | 2.26% | 129.9 K | 78.98% | 92.78% | 97.80% |
Utah | 1.85% | 12.4 K | 84.68% | 95.66% | 98.88% |
Vermont | 13.03% | 4.0 K | 50.00% | 50.00% | 50.00% |
Virginia | 1.77% | 27.4 K | 83.07% | 94.62% | 98.30% |
Washington | 2.06% | 22.0 K | 81.78% | 94.33% | 98.44% |
West Virginia | 2.59% | 5.6 K | 73.38% | 88.66% | 96.96% |
Wisconsin | 2.90% | 15.4 K | 69.97% | 90.40% | 97.47% |
Wyoming | 2.08% | 3.6 K | 81.62% | 94.44% | 98.58% |
All 50 States | 2.35% | 1.25M | 77.00% | 92.00% | 97.63% |
Atlanta | 6.76% | 1.97 M | 38.86% | 64.92% | 85.47% |
Austin | 6.69% | 706.0 K | 39.57% | 65.87% | 88.81% |
Baltimore | 6.52% | 891.0 K | 41.54% | 63.70% | 81.98% |
Boston | 6.95% | 1.45 M | 37.35% | 65.18% | 87.92% |
Charlotte | 6.51% | 1.01 M | 40.23% | 65.74% | 85.24% |
Chicago | 8.03% | 3.02 M | 33.81% | 58.34% | 82.76% |
Cincinnati | 8.97% | 730.1 K | 31.10% | 54.17% | 77.87% |
Cleveland | 10.27% | 716.3 K | 26.92% | 49.12% | 75.20% |
Colorado Springs | 4.37% | 248.1 K | 55.79% | 81.12% | 94.28% |
Dallas-Fort Worth | 5.98% | 2.15 M | 43.46% | 70.45% | 89.64% |
Denver | 5.17% | 959.9 K | 48.67% | 76.12% | 93.39% |
Detroit | 8.66% | 1.46 M | 32.66% | 54.69% | 78.20% |
Fort Collins | 5.16% | 128.4 K | 48.84% | 71.84% | 90.54% |
Houston | 6.40% | 2.08 M | 41.27% | 67.47% | 87.66% |
Jacksonville | 6.84% | 598.0 K | 39.61% | 64.70% | 85.93% |
Kansas City | 7.36% | 732.8 K | 36.60% | 61.34% | 83.33% |
Las Vegas | 5.08% | 743.4 K | 49.25% | 76.40% | 93.06% |
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | 6.38% | 2.95 M | 40.85% | 67.93% | 89.15% |
Miami-Fort Lauderdale | 7.33% | 2.21 M | 36.15% | 62.24% | 86.09% |
Minneapolis-St Paul | 6.05% | 1.23 M | 42.60% | 69.80% | 89.70% |
Nashville | 7.02% | 731.3 K | 37.76% | 62.98% | 83.72% |
New York | 8.24% | 5.04 M | 33.01% | 57.58% | 82.60% |
Orlando | 5.84% | 880.7 K | 43.59% | 71.28% | 90.30% |
Philadelphia | 8.57% | 1.96 M | 32.58% | 55.43% | 79.60% |
Phoenix | 6.02% | 1.58 M | 43.02% | 70.16% | 90.83% |
Pittsburgh | 12.65% | 773.1 K | 23.05% | 42.15% | 65.80% |
Portland | 5.74% | 775.6 K | 44.48% | 71.40% | 89.77% |
Raleigh | 5.61% | 465.9 K | 45.35% | 73.53% | 91.26% |
Riverside | 6.18% | 1.34 M | 42.61% | 67.20% | 84.89% |
Sacramento | 5.95% | 732.7 K | 43.23% | 72.20% | 90.57% |
San Antonio | 6.65% | 808.3 K | 39.57% | 64.91% | 85.71% |
San Diego | 6.25% | 865.0 K | 41.37% | 68.31% | 89.36% |
San Francisco | 6.92% | 1.26 M | 38.64% | 65.34% | 88.85% |
Seattle | 6.37% | 1.20 M | 39.98% | 68.94% | 90.30% |
St. Louis | 9.19% | 946.4 K | 30.01% | 53.68% | 77.64% |
Tampa | 7.21% | 1.20 M | 36.93% | 63.08% | 86.25% |
Tucson | 6.28% | 356.5 K | 42.08% | 68.53% | 88.27% |
Washington | 5.11% | 1.88 M | 49.36% | 75.36% | 91.90% |
Alabama | 9.53% | 1.39 M | 30.31% | 51.36% | 73.06% |
Alaska | NA | 189.3 K | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Arizona | 6.50% | 2.38 M | 40.50% | 66.57% | 87.80% |
Arkansas | 9.43% | 827.9 K | 30.83% | 51.75% | 72.62% |
California | 6.44% | 10.24 M | 40.69% | 66.87% | 87.08% |
Colorado | 5.48% | 2.00 M | 46.44% | 72.29% | 90.33% |
Connecticut | 8.25% | 1.16 M | 32.92% | 57.90% | 83.64% |
Delaware | 9.40% | 391.1 K | 30.17% | 52.43% | 77.43% |
District of Columbia | 7.26% | 179.4 K | 36.41% | 63.13% | 87.06% |
Florida | 7.54% | 8.36 M | 35.58% | 61.00% | 83.53% |
Georgia | 7.84% | 3.32 M | 35.31% | 58.63% | 79.12% |
Hawaii | 7.86% | 465.5 K | 33.41% | 58.76% | 83.15% |
Idaho | 6.48% | 676.2 K | 40.92% | 67.79% | 88.86% |
Illinois | 9.54% | 3.97 M | 29.28% | 51.64% | 75.66% |
Indiana | 8.72% | 2.27 M | 32.51% | 54.95% | 77.34% |
Iowa | 8.01% | 1.14 M | 34.73% | 56.89% | 79.31% |
Kansas | 7.75% | 921.0 K | 35.89% | 60.63% | 83.12% |
Kentucky | 9.14% | 1.33 M | 30.65% | 52.94% | 75.49% |
Louisiana | 10.31% | 1.18 M | 29.19% | 48.95% | 70.98% |
Maine | 11.97% | 466.0 K | 23.93% | 43.25% | 68.91% |
Maryland | 6.48% | 1.94 M | 41.48% | 64.82% | 83.40% |
Massachusetts | 7.36% | 2.12 M | 35.96% | 62.33% | 85.82% |
Michigan | 9.97% | 3.50 M | 29.10% | 50.11% | 74.15% |
Minnesota | 7.19% | 1.96 M | 37.23% | 62.47% | 83.68% |
Mississippi | 8.83% | 719.4 K | 33.17% | 54.24% | 76.49% |
Missouri | 9.07% | 2.06 M | 31.09% | 53.79% | 77.04% |
Montana | 9.37% | 401.5 K | 28.18% | 52.19% | 74.87% |
Nebraska | 7.25% | 590.4 K | 36.48% | 61.90% | 82.35% |
Nevada | 5.41% | 1.02 M | 46.78% | 73.81% | 90.90% |
New Hampshire | 7.63% | 540.4 K | 35.03% | 60.24% | 83.74% |
New Jersey | 7.83% | 2.75 M | 34.93% | 59.24% | 82.90% |
New Mexico | 6.11% | 625.5 K | 43.20% | 67.74% | 86.98% |
New York | 10.31% | 5.25 M | 27.23% | 49.04% | 74.86% |
North Carolina | 7.72% | 3.72 M | 35.62% | 59.10% | 79.01% |
North Dakota | 7.49% | 185.0 K | 36.51% | 61.90% | 84.33% |
Ohio | 10.47% | 3.84 M | 27.19% | 48.64% | 72.01% |
Oklahoma | 8.67% | 1.23 M | 32.94% | 54.28% | 74.89% |
Oregon | 6.69% | 1.39 M | 39.43% | 65.00% | 85.45% |
Pennsylvania | 10.57% | 4.09 M | 27.23% | 47.97% | 71.83% |
Rhode Island | 7.50% | 335.3 K | 35.09% | 61.32% | 85.99% |
South Carolina | 8.36% | 1.73 M | 33.54% | 55.92% | 77.57% |
South Dakota | 7.01% | 238.5 K | 38.38% | 64.39% | 82.58% |
Tennessee | 9.66% | 2.26 M | 30.27% | 51.11% | 72.36% |
Texas | 6.76% | 8.56 M | 39.21% | 64.61% | 85.33% |
Utah | 5.55% | 964.6 K | 45.53% | 73.15% | 91.36% |
Vermont | 5.19% | 239.2 K | 50.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
Virginia | 6.89% | 2.76 M | 39.67% | 62.05% | 79.53% |
Washington | 6.66% | 2.47 M | 38.95% | 66.42% | 87.35% |
West Virginia | 11.18% | 493.0 K | 27.11% | 45.91% | 65.54% |
Wisconsin | 8.74% | 2.02 M | 31.34% | 54.81% | 78.85% |
Wyoming | 7.79% | 216.0 K | 35.54% | 61.29% | 82.30% |
All 50 States | 7.74% | 103.1 M | 35.31% | 59.23% | 80.91% |
You must be logged in to post a comment.